Make talent quality your leading analytic with skills-based hiring solution.
Hiring technical talent has never been more competitive. Resumes and multiple-choice tests often fail to reveal whether a candidate can actually code under real-world conditions. That’s why companies are increasingly turning to live coding interview software.
In fact, according to our research, 76% of recruiters say traditional interviews don’t reliably measure coding ability, while 65% of hiring managers prefer live technical assessments because they mirror on-the-job tasks. Live coding sessions bring clarity to the process by showing what candidates can actually do in real time.
Glider AI makes this process smoother with a secure, collaborative IDE, AI proctoring, and integrated reporting. Instead of whiteboard puzzles or theoretical questions, recruiters and hiring managers get to see candidates demonstrate real coding skills in a setting that feels familiar and fair.
The primary goal of a live coding interview is to assess how a candidate applies their technical knowledge under real conditions.
Live coding interviews follow a structured process that balances rigor with candidate experience:
The result is a fair, transparent process that highlights both technical skill and problem-solving approach.
Many coding tests rely on contrived puzzles that don’t reflect actual work. Glider AI was built to replicate real-world technical environments, giving candidates a fair chance to demonstrate their skills and giving hiring teams the insights they need.
Here’s what makes Glider AI Live Coding Interviews different:
| Real-World Coding Simulation | Candidates code in a secure IDE with compilers, build tools, and package managers. |
| Broad Language Coverage | Support for over 250 languages, frameworks, and libraries. |
| Pair Programming Mode | Replicates collaboration to assess teamwork and communication. |
| Replay and Calibration | Record and replay sessions for training, fairness, and comparison. |
| Integrated AI Proctoring | Detects plagiarism, impersonation, and suspicious activity. |
| AI Assistant for Candidates | Guides candidates during sessions, clarifies instructions, and reduces confusion without giving away answers. |
| ATS Integration | Launch and manage live coding sessions directly from your ATS. |
| Candidate-Friendly Experience | Familiar tools reduce anxiety and allow candidates to focus on coding. |
| Data-Backed Reports | Automated insights highlight problem-solving ability, skill level, and fit for the role. |
Live coding interviews aren’t just about screening out unqualified candidates — they’re about building confidence in hiring decisions.
What is the purpose of a live coding interview?
To evaluate technical skills, problem-solving ability, and real-world coding performance in real time.
Are live coding interviews stressful for candidates?
They can be, but Glider AI reduces stress by using familiar tools, clear instructions, and candidate-friendly design.
How do live coding interviews prevent cheating?
With AI proctoring, secure environments, and plagiarism detection, integrity is maintained throughout.
Do live coding interviews work for all roles?
Yes. While especially common for developers, they can also be tailored for data scientists, QA engineers, and other technical positions.
When it comes to hiring, the interview is still the moment that makes or breaks a decision. But the way companies run interviews has hardly changed in decades—manual scheduling, inconsistent formats, and interviewer bias all create inefficiencies that slow down hiring and frustrate candidates. That’s why more organizations are turning to interview software to modernize […]
Test Skills, Not Resumes Recruiters today face a common challenge: how to separate real skills from resume claims. A SHRM study found that 78% of recruiters believe candidates exaggerate their skills. This leads to hiring bias, wasted time, and costly mis-hires. That’s where skill assessment software comes in. By testing candidates on the actual skills […]
Live interviews are one of the most important parts of hiring, but they’re also one of the least consistent. Two recruiters can run completely different interviews for the same role, leading to uneven candidate experiences and unreliable data. Hiring managers often struggle to compare results, and recruiters are left without the confidence that every skill […]
