Make talent quality your leading analytic with skills-based hiring solution.
AI-powered remote proctoring systems (AIPS) are fundamentally changing how recruiters assess candidates, making the process automated and efficient and requiring minimal human intervention.
These user-friendly systems continuously monitor candidates and their surroundings with impressive accuracy. The goal?
To protect the integrity of the examination process and prevent and identify suspicious activities that could indicate cheating, such as using prohibited devices, accessing other websites, or leaving the room.
Should you start using AI-powered remote proctoring solutions, too? The following benefits might convince you:
AI-based remote proctoring is a great recruitment tool, but it’s crucial to ensure it’s accessible to applicants.
Note that AI remote proctoring leans heavily on technology with minimal human involvement. To function optimally, these systems require:
Be sure to choose a user-friendly proctoring platform for everyone, including applicants with visual or cognitive impairments.
Provide alternative test material formats and allow applicants to use assistive technologies (such as screen readers, text-to-speech software, or screen magnification tools) to demonstrate your company’s commitment to inclusive hiring.
Finally, ensure that your remote proctoring system provides straightforward instructions so applicants who need accessibility features can quickly understand how to use the system and access support if necessary.
How do you create a secure and trustworthy virtual interview process for employers and candidates?
The actual implementation will depend on the platform you’re using. That said, general ways exist to maintain a secure and reliable virtual interview environment.
Here are some tips on how to use remote proctoring technology to improve your candidate evaluation efficiency:
Do you want to expand your talent pool beyond local waters?
Virtual interviewing lets you hire qualified candidates from around the world. It lets you tap into international talent markets to find people with unique skills and experiences.
It can be particularly beneficial if you’re hiring for niche positions where skilled professionals might be geographically dispersed.
Virtual interviews and remote proctoring also eliminate the travel expenses and time constraints that bog down traditional in-person interviews. And, of course, they offer immense flexibility for all parties.
Candidates can participate in a comfortable and familiar environment, potentially reducing interview anxiety and encouraging more authentic interactions.
Use cloud-based platforms that can be accessed online from any device to make the remote proctoring and virtual interview process even more seamless for candidates.
Consider integrating scheduling tools with your proctoring platform to make it easier for applicants to book their appointments.
Such a feature can also support better time zone management for interviewing talent from other parts of the world. Automated reminders and notifications keep both parties informed throughout the process.
Choose a platform that lets you customize settings for different interview types. For example, you should be able to set non-permissible activities.
An excellent remote proctoring platform has an intuitive, easy-to-navigate interface suitable for interviewers and candidates with varying technical expertise.
To make everything flow smoother, you can offer clear instructions and tutorials on using the platform and its features before the test or interview starts.
And, of course, remember to provide technical support resources in case of any issues.
Check if the platform has encryption, access controls, and secure data storage, among other essential security features. It should also communicate data privacy policies to the candidate (how their information is collected, used, and stored).
Finally, remember to obtain explicit consent from candidates, saying they agree to data collection and usage during the proctoring process.
The most advanced AI-powered remote proctoring tools support identity verification to ensure that the person taking the assessment is the same person who registered for it.
For example, Glider AI offers facial recognition/face detection features (while adhering to privacy regulations) and can flag and prevent unauthorized access.
It also provides a host of other advanced tracking and cheating analysis features — including AI-based plagiarism checkers — to maintain the integrity of your assessments.
The success of your remote proctoring efforts will depend on how well your team uses it. Take the time to train your interviewers to implement tests and interviews in a virtual environment.
Make sure that they fully understand how to use your platform’s features.
It’s also essential to guide candidates in preparing for their remote proctored interviews.
Give them pointers on setting up their testing environment. If the platform provides practice functionality, give them access to it so that they can familiarize themselves with how it works.
How to Use Phone Screening Questions to Identify Top Talent In today’s competitive job market, identifying top talent quickly and efficiently is crucial. One of the most effective tools at your disposal is the phone screen. When done correctly, phone screening can help you sift through a large number of candidates, narrowing down the pool […]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming the recruitment landscape, particularly in the realm of screening interviews. This technology is enabling companies to streamline their hiring processes, reduce bias, and improve candidate experiences. We explore how AI is revolutionizing screening interviews and delve into the concepts of what a screening interview is, the role of interview screening […]
Candidate Fraud vs. Skill Assessments It is no secret that when it comes to cheating or fraudulent practices, most people lie. Even when you have the facts, evidence, or data to prove the case, some people will still deny the truth. While the ‘damage control’ option of ‘denying’ might have worked for students and candidates in […]