6 min read

Are Your Candidates Real, Ready, and Capable, or Just AI Dependent?

joseph cole

Updated on August 13, 2025

Are Your Candidates Real, Ready, and Capable, or Just AI Dependent?

joseph cole

Updated on August 13, 2025

In this post

CREATE YOUR ACCOUNT

Accelerate the hiring of top talent

Make talent quality your leading analytic with skills-based hiring solution.

Get started

Why understanding a candidate’s true capability means balancing hard skills, soft skills, critical thinking, integrity, and AI fluency.

Technology has always promised to make work easier, faster, and smarter. And when used well, it does.

But history — and human nature — show us that the more we can automate, the more we’re tempted to disengage from the very skills that make us capable in the first place.

That’s not just a theoretical risk.

We’ve seen it in small ways already — calculators replacing mental math, GPS replacing spatial awareness, search engines replacing recall.

And pop culture has given us some of the clearest cautionary tales of what happens when convenience overtakes capability.

Take Pixar’s WALL-E (2008)

In WALL-E, humanity’s future isn’t destroyed by an asteroid, alien invasion, or AI uprising. It’s undone by comfort.

Generations of humans live aboard a space cruise ship, every need catered to by machines. They glide through life on hovering chairs, screens in front of their faces, food and drinks delivered instantly. No one walks. No one builds. No one questions. The skills that once defined human capability — movement, problem-solving, connection — fade away, replaced by passive consumption of what the machines provide.

It’s an exaggerated vision, but the caution is real: when we stop using our skills, we lose them. And when technology makes it too easy to outsource thinking, judgment, and decision-making, we risk trading capability for convenience.

That’s why, as we embrace AI — even in hiring — we need a responsible and realistic approach.

New tools like Cluley show just how quickly technology is moving toward real-time assistance, making it easier than ever to “skip” steps that once required deeper thinking or expertise. And while these innovations can be game-changing, they also raise an important question: are we building human capability alongside AI capability, or letting one replace the other?

Just like the calculator, spellcheck, or Google, AI will become an invisible part of our daily workflows. Those who know how to wield it will outperform those who don’t.

On that, we agree.

But here’s the catch: in hiring, AI proficiency alone isn’t enough to know if someone can actually do the job — and do it with integrity.

The Risk of an AI-Only Lens


If all we test is a candidate’s ability to prompt an AI tool, we’re ignoring the foundation that makes AI effective in the first place: human capability.

Consider this:

  • A Stanford and MIT study found that generative AI boosted productivity by 14% on average for customer support agents — but the biggest gains went to those who already had strong skills in the role.
  • IBM reports that 40% of the global workforce will need to reskill in the next three years because of AI adoption, but the top skills in demand aren’t just technical — they include problem-solving, teamwork, and adaptability.
  • Our own Glider AI assessment data shows that candidates who excel at hard skills but lack soft skills are 35% less likely to succeed past the first 90 days in hybrid or cross-functional roles.

AI can speed up output. But if the person can’t judge when it’s wrong, adapt to changing conditions, communicate the “why” behind the answer, or choose the ethical path when shortcuts are available — you’re just accelerating the wrong outcome.

A Better Analogy for AI


Yes — the calculator, spellcheck, and Google were once called “cheating.” But here’s the difference:

  • The calculator still requires you to understand the problem before you punch in the numbers.
  • Spellcheck helps only if you can recognize which word should be correct.
  • Google works only if you know what question to ask — and how to separate fact from fiction.

In the same way, AI is powerful only when the human behind it has the skills, judgment, and integrity to use it well. Without those, it’s like giving a calculator to someone who doesn’t understand math — the output might look right, but you’ll never know if it is.

Ensuring Human Capability in an AI-Driven World


The AI era isn’t about replacing human skills — it’s about amplifying them. The real challenge is making sure those skills are strong enough to guide AI, validate its output, and apply it in the right context.

That’s why it’s important to understand the role different AI tools play.

Cluley is an AI-powered real-time assistant. It can see your screen, hear your audio, and feed you relevant answers or insights on the spot — helping you respond faster, sound sharper, and move to solutions more quickly. It’s a performance accelerator in the moment, especially when speed and context are critical.

Glider AI is a skills validation and ID verification platform. It helps organizations ensure every candidate is real, ready, and capable before hiring, through a combination of AI skills assessment, live and one-way interviews, scenario-based challenges, and fraud prevention. This means we can validate not just a candidate’s ability to use AI tools like Cluley, but also their foundational human skills: critical thinking, judgment, communication, and integrity.

We don’t stop candidates from using AI, in fact, we design assessments where they can integrate AI into their process. The difference is that we score not only the final output, but how they got there, how they validated it, and whether they applied the right reasoning.

This approach does two things:

  1. Mitigates the risk of hiring someone who can “perform” only with an AI crutch but lacks independent capability.
  2. Confirms adaptability, ensuring they can deliver results both with and without AI assistance.

In a world where AI tools will be everywhere, Glider AI’s role is to make sure the people using them bring the human judgment, skill, and integrity that technology alone can’t provide.

What “Capability” / Skill Really Means


At Glider AI, we define capability as the intersection of five dimensions:

  1. Hard Skills: The technical and job-specific knowledge that grounds good decisions.
    E.g. A developer needs to know why a piece of code works before trusting AI-generated code.
  2. Soft Skills: Communication, collaboration, and leadership abilities that drive influence.
    In a PwC survey, 77% of CEOs ranked soft skills as equally or more important than hard skills in an AI-driven economy.
  3. Critical Thinking: The ability to question AI output, recognize bias, and weigh trade-offs.
    McKinsey’s “State of AI 2024” report found that AI hallucinations remain a top risk, making human judgment non-negotiable.
  4. AI Proficiency: Knowing how to use AI effectively, ethically, and creatively to accelerate outcomes.
    The World Economic Forum lists “AI and Big Data” among the top three fastest-growing skill sets.
  5. Integrity – The commitment to honesty, accountability, and ethical decision-making — even when AI makes it easy to cut corners.
    Harvard Business Review found that organizations with strong ethical cultures see 40% lower employee misconduct and higher long-term performance. In a world where AI can fabricate convincing but false content, integrity ensures trust stays intact.

Miss any one of these, and you risk hiring someone who can produce an answer, but not necessarily the right one, in the right way, for the right reason.

Why This Balance Matters


The workplace is evolving faster than job descriptions can keep up. Gartner predicts that by 2027, 50% of employees will need to learn new skills to remain effective in their role, many of them directly tied to navigating AI-augmented workflows.

That’s why our approach at Glider AI is to measure real-world readiness, not just theoretical ability:

  • Simulated Work Environments: Coding in live IDEs, solving case studies, or handling mock client escalations.
  • Scenario-Based Problem Solving: Realistic challenges that test judgment, adaptability, and decision-making under pressure.
  • AI-Integrated Tasks: Evaluations where candidates must leverage AI as part of the workflow — while being scored on how they guide, validate, and apply its output with integrity.

The Responsibility Factor


AI will reward leverage — but without nurturing human capability, we risk a future where humans become passengers rather than drivers. The danger isn’t that AI will replace people. It’s that people will replace their own skills with AI and have nothing left to contribute when the model falls short.

Responsible AI use means building the human skills that make AI more powerful, not letting those skills atrophy. The goal isn’t to avoid AI, rather it’s to ensure the people using it remain capable, creative, and in control.

So, What’s The Real Measure of AI Readiness?


AI will absolutely change the game. But the winners won’t be the people who can “cheat” with it — they’ll be those who can think critically, apply domain expertise, act with integrity, and use AI as a multiplier, not a replacement.

That’s the kind of capability we help you find.

Because in the future of work, the real question is:

Are your candidates real, ready, and capable, or just AI dependent?

4 min

Glider AI Skills Validation Platform

What is Glider AI? A Platform for Skills-Based Hiring and Retention Glider AI is a Skills Validation Platform that enables Enterprises, MSPs, and Staffing Firms with skill data to recruit and retain top talent for full-time employment and contingent workforce programs.   Using AI and automation, Glider AI creates scale and fairness at each stage of […]

5 min

Approach to Security, Compliance, and Privacy

Protection of Glider AI client, partner, and candidate data is critical to our business operations and maintained across our suite products and services. In this article we share our approach on keeping candidate, partner, and client data safe and in compliance with various governmental and organization specific requirements. For questions or comments  about our practices, […]

chevron-down