Make talent quality your leading analytic with skills-based hiring solution.
Not every impressive candidate is who they claim to be. Candidate fraud covers any attempt by an applicant to misrepresent their identity, credentials, skills, or even their physical presence during the hiring process, and it has moved from an occasional edge case to a mainstream hiring risk. Gartner’s research team has predicted that by 2028, one in four job candidate profiles worldwide could be fake, and in a Gartner survey of 3,000 job candidates, 6% admitted to some form of interview fraud, either impersonating someone else or having someone else pose as them (Gartner, July 2025).
That is not a niche problem, it is a hiring pipeline problem, and it is why more talent acquisition and risk teams are treating candidate fraud prevention as a core part of the recruiting process rather than an afterthought handled only by background check vendors.
This guide walks through what candidate fraud actually looks like today, why remote and high volume hiring has made it worse, the warning signs that should prompt a closer look, and the combination of process and technology that stops it before a bad hire ever reaches an offer letter.
Candidate fraud is not one behavior, it is a family of related tactics that show up at different stages of the funnel.
Three forces are compounding at once. Remote and hybrid hiring removed the in person moment where a mismatch between a resume and the person in front of you was easiest to catch. High volume, high turnover roles, contact centers, IT staffing, healthcare staffing, and seasonal retail, create pressure to move fast, which fraud actors exploit deliberately.
And generative AI tools have made it dramatically easier to produce a convincing fake resume, a coached answer, or a manipulated video feed at almost no cost. Put together, that is exactly why analysts like Gartner are forecasting the fake candidate problem to keep growing rather than level off.
No single signal proves fraud on its own, but a cluster of them should trigger a closer look before an offer goes out.
The strongest defense is layered, no single check catches everything, but each layer closes a gap the others miss.
Verify identity at multiple points, not just once at the start. A one time ID check at application is easy to route around with a proxy later in the process. Confirming identity again at the assessment and interview stages, ideally with government ID matching and biometric facial comparison like Glider’s ID Verify, closes that gap.
Add AI proctoring to remote assessments and interviews. AI proctoring monitors video, audio, and browser activity in real time to flag proxy test takers, unauthorized tabs, or a second person feeding answers, without requiring a human to watch every session live.
Test skills directly instead of relying on self reported experience. A structured skill assessment or a scored live interview makes it far harder for a fabricated resume to survive contact with an actual, job relevant task.
Combine identity, proctoring, and skills signals into one view. Looking at any single signal in isolation misses context that becomes obvious once you see it alongside the others, which is the idea behind bringing identity verification, proctoring, and assessment data together into a single Candidate 360 view of each applicant.
Learn from documented cases. Real world patterns, like the deepfake tactics used in remote interview fraud and the fraud reduction one financial institution achieved after tightening its process, documented in this bank recruiting case study, give hiring teams a concrete sense of what to watch for and what actually moves the needle.
The data backs this layered approach. Glider’s own analysis across millions of assessments found that fraud rates run as high as 20 to 25% when hiring relies on unverified, self reported signals, and drop to just 2 to 4% once identity verification and structured skill validation are layered into the process, a pattern explored in full in Candidate Fraud: Data from Millions of Assessments.
Candidate fraud is not going away, and by most credible forecasts it is going to keep growing as AI tools make impersonation cheaper and easier. The hiring teams that stay ahead of it are not the ones relying on gut instinct in a single interview, they are the ones who verify identity more than once, test skills directly, and let proctoring and identity data do the quiet work of catching what a resume and a friendly conversation cannot.
Candidate fraud is any attempt by a job applicant to misrepresent who they are, what they know, or what they have done during hiring, including fabricated resumes, stolen or borrowed identities, proxy interviews or test taking, and AI generated deepfake video or audio used to impersonate someone during a remote interview.
It is more common than most hiring teams assume. Gartner has predicted that one in four job candidate profiles could be fake by 2028, and separate industry surveys have found that the large majority of employers who screen resumes closely uncover some form of misrepresentation.
Common signs include audio and video that do not line up during a call, unusually polished answers paired with long pauses, resume and ID details that do not match, a skills assessment score far stronger than live performance, and resistance to camera or ID checks.
Layer your defenses: verify identity at more than one stage with government ID and biometric checks, add AI proctoring to remote assessments and interviews, and test skills directly with structured assessments rather than relying solely on a resume or a conversation.
It can be, depending on the specifics. Using someone else’s stolen identity to apply for a job, fabricating credentials to secure employment, or using deepfake technology to misrepresent identity can carry legal consequences in many jurisdictions, separate from the obvious business risk of a bad hire.
Remote hiring removes the in person moment that once made mismatches easy to spot, and it makes it far simpler for someone other than the actual applicant to sit an interview or assessment, which is part of why the FBI has specifically warned about deepfake and stolen identity fraud targeting remote roles.
Resume fraud is one type of candidate fraud, specifically misrepresentation on the written application or resume. Candidate fraud is the broader category that also includes identity fraud, proxy interviews, proxy testing, and deepfake impersonation during live interactions.
Candidate cheating covers any attempt by an applicant to gain an unfair advantage during an interview or assessment, from a quiet second monitor with answers open to a full proxy test taker completing the exercise on someone else’s behalf. It is not a new problem, but the tools available to candidates who want to cheat […]
AI proctoring is technology that monitors a candidate during a remote assessment or interview, using video, audio, and browser activity analysis, to confirm the person taking the test is who they claim to be and that they are completing it honestly, without a human proctor needing to watch the session live. It has moved from […]
Hiring fraud is any form of deception that enters a company’s recruiting process with the goal of securing a job, an interview outcome, or access the person would not legitimately qualify for. It sits one level above “candidate fraud,” which describes what an individual applicant does, because hiring fraud also covers the systemic gaps, unverified […]
