4 min read

Using Skills Based Hiring Talent Intelligence To Improve Your Recruitment Process

joseph cole

Updated on April 29, 2023

Using Skills Based Hiring Talent Intelligence To Improve Your Recruitment Process

joseph cole

Updated on April 29, 2023

In this post

CREATE YOUR ACCOUNT

Accelerate the hiring of top talent

Make talent quality your leading analytic with skills-based hiring solution.

Get started

Hiring has never been more data rich, and it has never been easier to hire the wrong person anyway. Resumes can be embellished, interview answers can be coached or generated, and traditional screening still leans heavily on credentials and gut feel rather than proof of actual ability. Skills based hiring, paired with talent intelligence, gives recruiting teams a way to verify what a candidate can really do before an offer goes out, instead of finding out after the first quarter of the new hire’s performance.

According to NACE’s Job Outlook 2026 survey, 70 percent of employers now report using skills based hiring practices, up from 65 percent the year before, and 71 percent of that group apply the approach at least half of the time. The trend line is clear: organizations that treat skills data as a first class part of the hiring process are pulling ahead of those still relying on resumes and unstructured interviews alone.

Candidates and Malpractices

Not every resume tells the full truth. Common issues recruiters run into include inflated job titles, exaggerated years of experience, misrepresented proficiency levels, and in more serious cases, candidates who use outside help during interviews or technical screens. Simply terminating a mis hired employee once the damage is done is not a strategy; it does not recover the training time, the team disruption, or the lost productivity that came before the exit.

A survey covered by Northwestern’s Kellogg School found a majority of hiring managers admit they have made a wrong hire at some point, and industry research from the Recruiting and Employment Confederation ties bad hires to real financial losses in training spend, lost productivity, and elevated staff turnover. Much of this traces back to the same root cause: hiring decisions made on subjective impressions and unverified claims rather than demonstrated skill.

Cost of a Bad Hire

According to the U.S. Department of Labor and data commonly cited by SHRM, a bad hire can cost 30 to 50 percent of that employee’s annual salary once training, lost productivity, and replacement recruiting are factored in, and the total organizational impact can run considerably higher for specialized or leadership roles. For a business hiring at volume, even a modest bad hire rate compounds into a significant, recurring cost line.

Much of this cost is preventable. Research from the Harvard Business Review points to a common root cause: companies that manage hiring in house are often left to write job descriptions and screen candidates without a reliable way to verify the skills behind a resume, so decisions default to interview performance and pedigree instead of proof of ability. Skills based hiring closes that gap by testing what a candidate can actually do, and talent intelligence turns the results into data that can be tracked, compared, and improved over time.

Recruitment Automation and Verifying Real Skill

Skills based hiring only works if the results can be trusted, which is why verification and integrity checks matter as much as the assessment content itself. Glider AI builds this in with recruitment automation, including remote monitoring during assessments, so employers can be confident a scored result reflects the candidate’s own work.

At a high level, this automation covers a few areas:

  • Session monitoring: Webcam and screen recording tools let recruiters review how a candidate worked through an assessment, not just the final score.
  • Identity and attention checks: Face detection flags multiple people in frame or a candidate looking away for extended periods, with an initial image capture used to help confirm the same person completes the full assessment.
  • Activity tracking: Tab switching and window changes during an assessment are logged, since that behavior is one of the most common ways candidates attempt to search for answers or copy code from another source.
  • Plagiarism and originality checks: Submitted code or written answers can be checked for similarity against other submissions and outside sources.
  • Automated flagging: Suspicious patterns are surfaced to recruiters automatically with a full audio and video audit trail, rather than requiring a human to watch every session live.

This is a deliberately brief overview. For a full walkthrough of how Glider’s proctoring technology works, see the AI Proctoring product page and the AI proctoring hiring guide.

How Skills Based Hiring and Talent Intelligence Work Together

Skills based hiring generates the raw signal: structured, scored evidence of what a candidate can do. Talent intelligence is what turns that signal into a repeatable process, by aggregating assessment results, monitoring outcomes, and hiring funnel data so recruiting teams can see which skills actually predict on the job performance, where candidates commonly struggle, and where the pipeline is losing strong candidates to slow or inconsistent screening.

Used together, the two reduce reliance on resume keywords and unstructured interview impressions, shorten time to a confident decision, and give hiring teams a defensible, data backed reason for every advance or reject decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is skills based hiring?
Skills based hiring is a recruiting approach that evaluates candidates primarily on demonstrated, tested abilities relevant to the job, rather than relying mainly on degrees, job titles, or years of experience listed on a resume.

What is talent intelligence?
Talent intelligence is the practice of collecting and analyzing hiring and workforce data, such as assessment results, screening outcomes, and performance signals, to make faster, more accurate, and more consistent hiring decisions.

How does skills based hiring reduce the cost of a bad hire?
By verifying real ability before an offer is made, skills based hiring reduces the chance of hiring someone whose actual capability does not match their resume, which is one of the most common root causes behind the training, productivity, and turnover costs that make up the cost of a bad hire.

How Can Glider AI Help You With Skills Based Hiring and Talent Intelligence?

Glider’s recruitment platform is designed to prioritize competency over credentials, enabling organizations to assess candidates’ skills objectively and efficiently. Use Glider AI Skill Intelligence to streamline the hiring process, identify top quality candidates, and ensure a mobile friendly, candidate friendly experience.

Glider AI’s Unique Features

Go ahead and streamline your next hire with Glider AI today!

Schedule a Demo or contact us at info@glider.ai

Take Home Assignment Outsourcing: When Candidates Pay Someone Else to Do Their Test

Take home assignment outsourcing happens when a candidate has someone else, a freelancer, a friend, or a paid ghost writing service, complete their take home coding, design, or writing test for them. Because the assignment is done alone, on the candidate’s own schedule, and away from any interviewer or proctor, nothing about the format itself […]

Leaked Interview Questions: How Candidates Share Test Bank Answers Online

Leaked interview questions are exact, or nearly exact, copies of a company’s real assessment or interview questions that have been collected, compiled, and shared, often for a price, so that later candidates can memorize the answer before they ever see the question live. This is a test bank leak: a candidate is not solving a […]

What’s the best platform for technical skills assessments and coding interviews?

Technical skills assessments have become the foundation of modern engineering hiring. Yet just a few years ago, most technical hiring teams still relied heavily on resumes, recruiter screenings, and live whiteboard interviews to evaluate engineers. While common, these methods were often slow, inconsistent, and prone to favouring candidates who performed well in interviews rather than […]

chevron-down